Supplementing the 2018 budget
Government proposal to Parliament to supplement the 2018 budget proposal (HE 106/2017 vp)
A supplementary proposal to the 2018 central government budget (HE 106/2017 vp), comprising adjustments made subsequently by the Government to the budget proposal. It is considered together with the main budget proposal.
- Status
- Passed with amendments
- Submitted
- 16 Nov 2017
- Latest event
- 24 Nov 2017
- Votes
- 0
- Speeches
- 245
- Statute
- 1068/2017
- Source
- eduskunta.fi ↗
How Parliament voted
The bill passed without a vote – no MP proposed rejecting or amending it in plenary.
Debate in the chamber
What was argued and where each group stood, followed by MPs' speeches verbatim from the parliamentary record. Speeches are shown in their original language.
245 speeches · 2 debates
Key points of the debate
Parliament debated the supplement to the 2018 central government budget and broader economic policy in a heated exchange between the Government and the opposition. The government parties highlighted positive trends in economic growth and employment as well as the stabilisation of public finances. The opposition, for its part, criticised the Government for ignoring growing inequality, cutting education and basic social security, and unfair income distribution.
- Should the fruits of economic growth be shared equally by all, or does the budget increase inequality?
- Have central government indebtedness and the structural deficit been curbed sufficiently during the economic upswing?
- Are index freezes and cuts to benefits reasonable for the most vulnerable?
- National Coalition PartyIn favour
Economic growth and employment have improved rapidly, and the line chosen by the Government of work and moderate fiscal policy is producing results without extra fiscal leeway.
”Tänään saimme jälleen kerran hyviä uutisia Suomen talouden ja työllisyyden kehityksestä.”
— Petteri Orpo - Centre PartyIn favour
The Government's actions have turned Finland's economy into a strong upswing, created jobs, and made additional investments in transport projects and central government transfers to municipalities possible.
”Hallituksen esitys täydentävästä budjetista ensi vuoden talousarviota koskien on erittäin hyvä ja perusteltu ja kuvaa hyvin sitä, mikä on Suomen talouden tilanne tällä hetkellä.”
— Hannu Hoskonen - Blue ReformIn favour
The economic policy pursued by the Government has been responsible and effective, the employment rate is rising, and important additional resources have been allocated to internal security and veterans.
”Tämä budjetti on vastuullinen budjetti, jonka ovat tehneet hallituspuolueet, siniset, keskusta ja kokoomus, yhdessä.”
— Kaj Turunen - Finns PartyAgainst
The Government does not pay sufficient attention to low-income people outside working life and pensioners, nor does it curb spending arising from immigration or EU liabilities.
”Kannatan edustaja Meren tekemää epäluottamuslause-ehdotusta.”
— Toimi Kankaanniemi - Social DemocratsAgainst
The fruits of economic growth are not being distributed fairly; instead, the Government continues a policy that increases inequality and cuts basic social security, as well as support for low-income earners and families with children.
”Olosuhteissa, joissa talous kasvaa, on käsittämätöntä, ettei haluta eriarvoisuuskehitystä ja sen aiheuttamia ongelmia korjata nyt tässä budjetissa, jonka hallitus on esittänyt.”
— Antti Rinne - GreensAgainst
The Government is not investing enough in education, family leave reform or climate action, and despite economic growth, basic social security for low-income earners is falling behind.
”Talouden piristyminen on iloinen asia, mutta me olemme samaan aikaan hyvin pettyneitä siihen, että hallitus ei millään pysty jakamaan talouskasvun hedelmiä paremmin.”
— Ozan Yanar - Left AllianceAgainst
Economic policy increases income inequality and poverty, cuts education, and weakens the sustainability of public finances because of unfair tax cuts.
”Heti puheeni alkuun haluan kannattaa edustaja Uotilan tekemää epäluottamuslausetta.”
— Jari Myllykoski - Swedish People's PartyAgainst
Although easing the taxation of labour is a step in the right direction, the Government's actions in reforming the labour market and economic structures are too modest.
”Monien toimenpiteiden kohdalla nähdään tällä hetkellä hyviä päätöksiä ja suunta on aivan oikea, mutta joissakin asioissa ne askeleet ovat todella vaatimattomia.”
— Mikaela Nylander - Christian DemocratsAgainst
The benefits of growth do not reach families with children and older people, whose livelihoods continue to be eroded by index cuts and freezes.
”Aivan aluksi haluan kannattaa edustaja Östmanin tekemää epäluottamuslausetta.”
— Sari Essayah
This digest was generated by AI from 245 speeches 13 Sep 2026. Group positions are read from the speeches, not from votes; quotations were checked verbatim against the record. The longest speeches were shortened in the digest's source material.
Keskustelu päättyi. Asia lähetettiin valtiovarainvaliokuntaan.
Täysistunto keskeytettiin kello 16.00. Täysistuntoa jatkettiin kello 18.00.
Stages of consideration
The bill's path from the preliminary debate to the decision, as recorded by Parliament.
- 16 Nov 2017Eduskuntakäsittelyn vireilletulo · Valtiovarainministeriö
- 21 Nov 2017Lähetekeskustelu · Täysistunto
Decisions by law proposal1
- Vuoden 2018 talousarvioHyväksytty muutettuna · 1068/2017
The title and summaries are machine translations of the Finnish AI summaries. Speeches and quotations are always shown in their original language.